|
Equality in access to public employment Matching interest The Supreme Court will determine “what the cut-off score must be used to carry out a psychotechnical test ordered in execution of a sentence in a selective process for access to the public service so that it is compatible with the right to equality.” The First Section of the Contentious-Administrative Chamber has issued an order by which it has admitted for processing an appeal Phone Number List for cassation, filed against an order of the Executions and Extension of Effects Section of the Contentious-Administrative Chamber of the Court Superior Court of Justice of Madrid , in the incident of execution of sentence. The appeal has been presented by an opponent who aspired to join the National Police , represented by the Suárez-Valdés Legal Office . Lawyer Antonio Suárez-Valdés explains that every year a large number of opponents of the National Police are declared “unfit” in the personal interview or in the medical examination .
Many of them turn to the courts , dissatisfied with these suspensions. The Suárez-Valdés Legal Office highlights that in recent years they have won about 600 cases of this type, in contentious procedures in which, they claim, 99% of the sentences estimate the resources of the opponents. When this situation occurs, when a court revokes the “not suitable” in any opposition test, the person affected has to complete the missing tests of said opposition. In many cases, these opponents are left with the psychotechnical test , which they must take in the next call after the ruling that has given them their reason. All suspended It turns out that one year a significant group of opponents gathered and managed to revoke their “not suitable” in court. The General Directorate of the Police called a psychotechnical test only for these opponents .
Affected denounced that it was an exam “impossible to resolve”: the 28 opponents who took it failed, when it is usual for close to 90% to pass this psychotechnical test. Origin promotion cut-off mark Again, the matter went to court. The Superior Court of Justice of Madrid ordered the General Directorate of the Police to repeat the test for all those opponents. The judges determined that, in these cases of opponents who continued the tests by judicial decision, the Police had to subject them to the same psychotechnical test that was carried out on the applicants for the next admission call . He also specified that the cut-off instance. 85% failed The Suárez-Valdés Legal Office considered that the conflict had been resolved, but this was not the case. The cut-off mark for these tests is set with a Gauss bell, and is linked to the difficulty of the test. The lawyers who have handled these cases explain that in the original calls from 2017 to 2019 the test was easier, and that increased the cut-off grade .
|
|